windjunky
04-24-2016, 12:44 AM
hello guys,
i currently own a miata mk1, its a nice car but.
it lacks a Rotary engine this is the reason i'm looking for a diffrent car becaus stuffing a Rotary in an miata is a big Head ace.
so yesterday i took a peek at a rx7 fc n/a from 86.
the car is pretty much disasabled. on one hand thats a good thing becaus it forces me to clean en repair every single part and replace if needed.
the downside however is that i don't know if all the parts are there, from what i could see there are about 2 cars in parts.
but annyways i have been wondering if one could turbo a N/A
after a bit of research i'm not shure i read a lot about rear diffs failing engine compressions and stuf.
i wanted to turbo my miata so i'm in for the efford of drilling welding etc.
so is it realy that big of a deal. i meen if the compression is a lot higher in a n/a i could just run lower boost to get the same result, the part about rear diffs failing i'm not sure if i believe that i meen wouldend it be much cheaper for Mazda to produce one diff for n/a and turbo engines. so why would there be a diffrent diff in the N/A.?
Annyways to much questions for a new forum member thread.
the real question is should i buy the N/A car and spend a lot of time an afford in it or should i find a turbo car?(the N/A is pretty cheap btw)
i currently own a miata mk1, its a nice car but.
it lacks a Rotary engine this is the reason i'm looking for a diffrent car becaus stuffing a Rotary in an miata is a big Head ace.
so yesterday i took a peek at a rx7 fc n/a from 86.
the car is pretty much disasabled. on one hand thats a good thing becaus it forces me to clean en repair every single part and replace if needed.
the downside however is that i don't know if all the parts are there, from what i could see there are about 2 cars in parts.
but annyways i have been wondering if one could turbo a N/A
after a bit of research i'm not shure i read a lot about rear diffs failing engine compressions and stuf.
i wanted to turbo my miata so i'm in for the efford of drilling welding etc.
so is it realy that big of a deal. i meen if the compression is a lot higher in a n/a i could just run lower boost to get the same result, the part about rear diffs failing i'm not sure if i believe that i meen wouldend it be much cheaper for Mazda to produce one diff for n/a and turbo engines. so why would there be a diffrent diff in the N/A.?
Annyways to much questions for a new forum member thread.
the real question is should i buy the N/A car and spend a lot of time an afford in it or should i find a turbo car?(the N/A is pretty cheap btw)